Canter Levin & Berg Solicitors Call Now on 08000 832 832
subscribers login here   Twitter
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Services
    • Our People
    • About Canter Levin & Berg
    • Contact
    • Complaints
    • Where We Are
  • The Service
    • Subscribers
    • Free Newsletter
    • Pay Online
    • View Brochure
    • Case Studies
    • Prices
    • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Employees
  • Contact

Image navigation

sharon-shoesmith-415×275

Published July 16, 2011 at 415 × 275 in the sad case of Baby P and Sharon Shoesmith
sharon-shoesmith-415x275

Logging In...

Profile cancel

Sign in with Twitter Sign in with Facebook
or

Not published

Login

  • Register
  • Lost Password

search the blog

subscribe to our newsletter




Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter

Twitter


followers
/0 seconds ago
R0 seconds ago

new articles

  • employee shareholder contracts – unwelcome, unworkable and unlikely to see the light of day
  • yet another TUPE round up!
  • new employment law popping up in the most unlikely locations
  • unreasonable prior warnings can make a dismissal unfair
  • better redundancy deals for older workers?
  • flexible work requests and flexible parental leave
  • a well-meaning homespun impression of human rights
  • it’s not apportionment – but it certainly looks like it
  • Poundland and (not) human rights
  • whistleblowing update
  • legal advice privilege only covers advice from legally qualified advisers
  • disciplinary sanctions – a caveat

new comments

  • Miikka on why it is a nonsense to maintain that tribunals are an informal alternative to court proceedings
  • twitter_martinmalone on …and finally for 2012
  • Rodney Rue on servant or serf?

Categories

  • ACAS (5)
  • adjournments (1)
  • administrations (1)
  • age discrimination (10)
  • agency workers (2)
  • asylum seekers (1)
  • Beecroft (2)
  • bias (1)
  • bonus payments (3)
  • breach of contract (4)
  • bribery (3)
  • Budget (1)
  • burden of proof (1)
  • CLB Employment Solutions (125)
  • compensation (18)
  • compromise agreements (10)
  • compulsory work (1)
  • constructive dismissal (2)
  • consultation (4)
  • contract terms (35)
  • contracts of employment (19)
  • corporate manslaughter (1)
  • costs (2)
  • Court of Appeal (10)
  • damages (7)
  • data protection (1)
  • date of termination (1)
  • Directive (3)
  • disability discrimination (10)
  • disciplinary hearings (8)
  • discrimination (49)
  • discrimination issues (20)
  • dismissal by employer (1)
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal (15)
  • employment law (88)
  • employment law reform (7)
  • employment status (10)
  • employment tribunal decisions (11)
  • employment tribunals (22)
  • equal opportunities (3)
  • equal pay (3)
  • Equality Act 2010 (14)
  • European Court decisions (9)
  • European Court of Human Rights (2)
  • events (1)
  • ex gratia payment (1)
  • expert witnesses (1)
  • fee exemptions (1)
  • fit notes (1)
  • flexible working (9)
  • garden leave (1)
  • gold plating Directives (1)
  • headline (8)
  • health and safety (3)
  • High Court decisions (3)
  • holidays (9)
  • human rights (7)
  • illegal contracts (2)
  • immigration (2)
  • industrial action (1)
  • insolvency (1)
  • insurance (1)
  • interns (1)
  • investigation (1)
  • judicial review (1)
  • jurisdiction (2)
  • legal professional privilege (1)
  • legislation (1)
  • manner of dismissal (1)
  • marital status (2)
  • maternity leave (6)
  • maternity pay (5)
  • mediation (2)
  • mesothelioma (1)
  • minimum wage (7)
  • misconduct (3)
  • news (122)
  • newsletter (15)
  • newsletter (64)
  • no-fault dismissal (1)
  • overtime (1)
  • parental leave (1)
  • part-time workers (1)
  • paternity leave (3)
  • pay reductions (3)
  • pensions (5)
  • philosophical belief (1)
  • place of work (1)
  • pleural plaques (1)
  • police (1)
  • political affiliation (2)
  • positive discrimination (3)
  • private sector pay (1)
  • privilege (3)
  • procedure (59)
  • protected conversations (1)
  • public sector pay (1)
  • qualifying period (3)
  • race discrimination (4)
  • reasonable adjustments (2)
  • reasons for dismissal (2)
  • recruitment (1)
  • redundancy (16)
  • references (4)
  • refugees (1)
  • reinstatement (3)
  • religion or belief (13)
  • resignation (1)
  • rest breaks (1)
  • restrictive covenants (3)
  • retirement (12)
  • settlement agreements (1)
  • sex discrimination (4)
  • sickness absence (3)
  • sideline (2)
  • social media (4)
  • stigma damages (1)
  • strike (1)
  • subscription enquiries (2)
  • Supreme Court (4)
  • suspension (1)
  • tax (6)
  • termination of employment (6)
  • territory (1)
  • time limits (4)
  • TUPE (25)
  • twitter (1)
  • uncategorized (16)
  • unfair dismissal (41)
  • vicarious liability (1)
  • wages disputes (2)
  • website (2)
  • whistleblowing (5)
  • work placements (1)
  • working time (7)

Archives

  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
Proudly powered by WordPress