We’re currently upgrading the website to add secure access to the protected areas for subscribers and quicker access to the remainder of the site. Please bear with us if you have problems accessing any content and call free on 08000 320 974 if you need any assistance. We’ll be adding lots of new content very shortly so we hope that any problems in the meantime will prove worthwhile.

Flexible working is still often seen solely as a benefit for part-time working mothers with young children. However, a new guide for managers, published by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, shows how employers in many different sectors are gaining better business results from making alternative work patterns widely available to employees.
A medium-sized engineering company in the Midlands making components for the car industry is not an obvious place to find flexible work arrangements. But Stuart Fell, owner of West Bromwich Tool and Engineering Company, told ‘The Times’ in October that two-way flexibility between him and his workers is at the core of his business model. Moreover, it a key ingredient in the success of his business.
The company, which makes pressed metal parts for large manufacturers such as BMW and Nissan, employs about 100 people on nearly 50 different working arrangements. “On paper, it seems very complicated,” Mr Fell said, “but it works very well and the company and employees each get what they need.
“This adaptable and ever-changing arrangement has proved to be capable of producing high performance and is not complicated to manage.”
He says that some employees would not be working for the company without the flexible options, ranging from variable start and finish times to early and late shifts, term-time working and time off at short notice. People are willing to come in early or stay late to get things done when necessary, he said. “There is business we have won because we have been able to respond quickly to a customer demand.”
Based on trust and two-way dialogue between managers and employees, the policy helped when the recession forced the press works to move employees to a four-day week at 80 per cent of pay for three months earlier this year. “When we told them these were extraordinary circumstances and things were bad, they really understood that it was serious and necessary and believed that we were telling the truth.”
Helen Mahy, company secretary at National Grid, which runs gas and electricity transmission networks, has a team of 70 in the UK, about half of whom have formal or informal flexibility, for example working from home for part of the week. This has helped her to recruit and retain skilled people. In general, company secretaries’ departments are fairly traditional, she said, also speaking to ‘The Times’, “There’s a view that you have to be where the board is and where the management and head office are. Yes, you do — but you don’t all have to be there at the same time.”
Handled well, flexibility gives managers a powerful tool to respond to both customers’ and employees’ needs. The business benefits documented in the guide include greater efficiency and productivity, better customer service cover, improved staff retention, reduced absenteeism, more efficient use of workspace and an enhanced reputation as an employer.
Despite the benefits, however, some industries remain resistant to flexible working. An Equality Commission report last week on flexible working for fathers showed that construction, manufacturing, retail and transport were the industries least likely to offer non-standard working arrangements.
Some employers fear that flexible working could be costly, complicated or even harmful to the business — yet more than 90 per cent of small businesses surveyed by the British Chambers of Commerce reported that set-up costs were zero or minimal. More than 70 per cent said that flexibility improved employee relations and more than half reported higher productivity.
• Working Better: A managers’ guide to Flexible Working by Alison Maitland for the Equality and Human Rights Commission, is available free at www.equalityhumanrights.com/flexible

Injury stricken Manchester United are rumoured to be appraoching the out of contract (or unemployed) Sol Campbell.

United boss Sir Alex Ferguson has only one first team defender available at present and has resorted to playing numerous players out of position (albeit successfully) to fill the gap. Although this cannot carry on long term.

Ex England Sol Campbell possesses a wealth of talent and would more than confidently fill the gap.

Being unemployed at the moment, plus the chance to play for Man United, if there is any truth in it I am sure Sol will jump at the chance.

Manchester United could benefit from putting him on a fixed term contract (say 6 months) then when injury free they can thank him and part ways with no nasty termination payments.

Michael Owen was out of contract, and look at what a sensational (and inexpensive) choice that was by Manchester United.

Obviously a “Win Win” situation for Man United & the unemployed Sol Campbell

The Health and Safety Executive has been criticised for running radio ads in which figures concerning work-related diseases caused by exposure to asbestos were stated as definitive when they were in fact based on estimates and overstating the number of deaths resulting from such exposure.

Five ads were broadcast as part of a campaign to raise awareness of the risk of exposure to asbestos, particularly in the building and general construction industries. The central messages included the assertions that every year more people are killed by asbestos than in road accidents and that a certain number of workers and tradesmen in particular categories would die each week, e.g. six joiners, six electricians, three plumbers.

The Asbestos Watchdog complained that the assertions were misleading and could not be substantiated because they were based on flawed calculations and exaggerations. Both complaints were upheld and the HSE was directed in a decision on 23 September that it must not broadcast the ads in their current form.

While the mesage which the HSE was concerned to get across was clearly laudable, the adjudication acts as a timely reminder that it is easy for organisations to overstate their cases, particularly when engaged in marketing and advertising activities. The TUC has described the ASA ruling as “unfortunate” but the point here is that, no matter how laudable the message, there is no excuse for not getting facts right. That applies to all, including those whose function it is ensure compliance with regulations!